| 01:46 | <GPHemsley> | oy, what a bulky test suite this is |
| 06:45 | <ondras> | a quick question -- how does a XHR interact with the content-disposition:attachemnt response header? |
| 06:46 | MikeSmith | XhmikosR howdy |
| 09:45 | <smaug> | Any folks from React here? |
| 09:47 | <hsivonen> | Domenic, gsnedders: https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/issues/57#issuecomment-308654813 indicates we should wait for r12a to address my claims of test suite bugs |
| 09:47 | <hsivonen> | Domenic: I commented LGTM to merge EUC-KR, Shift_JIS and Big5 tests |
| 09:47 | <hsivonen> | Domenic: thanks |
| 13:04 | <smaug> | #join #react |
| 13:04 | <smaug> | oops |
| 16:44 | <Domenic> | Twitter does not like square logos anymore... https://twitter.com/storagestandard |
| 16:57 | <hasather> | Domenic: Hey. I saw http://logs.glob.uno/?c=freenode%23whatwg&s=14+Jun+2017&e=14+Jun+2017#c1030325 `elements` does include form controls outside of the form though, test e.g. data:text/html,<form id=a></form><input form=a><script>alert(a.elements.length)</script> |
| 16:58 | <hasather> | is the spec wrong there? (The original question was http://logs.glob.uno/?c=freenode%23whatwg&s=14+Jun+2017&e=14+Jun+2017#c1030301) |
| 17:08 | <Domenic> | hasather: well, it looks like it's an interop issue; Edge at least gives 0 for that test case, although FIrefox and Chrome do give 1. Would you mind opening a spec bug so we can collect opinions from implementers? |
| 17:15 | <hasather> | Domenic: Edge doesn't support the 'form' attribute yet, see https://wpdev.uservoice.com/forums/257854-microsoft-edge-developer/suggestions/7327649-add-support-for-the-form-attribute. I'll file a bug on the spec. Thanks. |
| 17:16 | <hasather> | Domenic: Actually noticed this when implementing the 'form' attribute in jsdom. :) |
| 17:16 | <Domenic> | oh i see :) |
| 17:22 | <jsbell> | Domenic: for the big5 PR - ping me when the CI finishes if I don't notice first |
| 17:23 | <Domenic> | jsbell: sounds good, will do |
| 17:32 | <hasather> | Domenic: https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/2764 |
| 17:39 | <Domenic> | hasather: awesome, will look into it |
| 19:53 | <Domenic> | hsivonen: if the numbers at https://travis-ci.org/w3c/web-platform-tests/builds/243381522 are any indication, good job on encoding_rs performance, FF nightly is taking like 3/5 of the time of Safari and Chrome |
| 19:55 | <Domenic> | (Although using Travis for perf comparison is probably dubious, given how it's subject to fluctuating cloud resources) |
| 20:40 | <Domenic> | jsbell: https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/6254 ready for review |
| 21:07 | <wanderview> | Domenic: is it safe to use async functions in WPT now? |
| 21:07 | <Domenic> | wanderview: yes, although Servo folks might be sad. |
| 21:07 | <wanderview> | Domenic: if spidermonkey has async functions, won't servo have them too? |
| 21:08 | <Domenic> | wanderview: servo updates spidermonkey rarely, if ever... |
| 21:08 | <wanderview> | Domenic: well, they can remedy it if they want then |
| 21:08 | <Domenic> | Indeed |
| 21:08 | <Domenic> | They might be sad, but it's not a blocker |
| 21:08 | <wanderview> | Domenic: no one is going to want to run this test anyway |
| 21:09 | wanderview | is testing about:blank replacement interaction with service workers. |
| 21:09 | <Domenic> | good times |
| 22:11 | <jyasskin> | Do folks have a favorite Jabber client? It looks like that's what the IETF uses... |
| 22:14 | <Domenic> | I used to use Trillian, but I can't imagine it's kept up with the times... |
| 23:08 | <jsbell> | Domenic: done |
| 23:11 | <jsbell> | Domenic: thanks for picking the tests up! |
| 23:17 | <Domenic> | :) they just seemed so close, and it was a shame to let them languish |