00:00
<railgun>
no I haven't seen this
00:00
<TimothyGu>
oh yeah that's the repo containing the tools for building
00:00
<railgun>
so if I just follow the instructions I should have a version like the one on the site?
00:00
<TimothyGu>
railgun: yup
00:01
<TimothyGu>
clone html-build alongside html
00:01
<TimothyGu>
it'll find your source file automatically
00:02
<ska>
I'm trying to use this https://github.com/widget-/slack-black-theme but I'd like to use a local copy of that fetch() url.
00:30
<railgun>
TimothyGu: just tried html-build and it worked, thanks!
01:38
<railgun>
would be helpful if the wattsi readme was updated with a reminder that you need to add bin/wattsi to your path
01:39
<TimothyGu>
railgun: yay!
01:44
<railgun>
TimothyGu: mind if I submit a pull request? wattsi makes things a lot faster too, so I think the README should be more straight-forward
01:45
<TimothyGu>
railgun: go ahead. I don't maintain wattsi though
01:49
<railgun>
ok, thanks for the tips btw, this is a lot better than what I was doing before
02:04
<railgun>
is this correct for issue #3441? https://i.imgur.com/0IVBCwX.jpg cc: annevk
03:42
<MikeSmith>
PSA for those who like Dockerfiles: I created a Dockerfile of the HTML checker and put it on Docker Hub
03:42
<MikeSmith>
https://hub.docker.com/r/validator/validator/
03:45
<Domenic>
Oooh
03:46
<Domenic>
I wonder if that'd be faster than downloading the jar
03:46
<Domenic>
Probably similar
03:47
<MikeSmith>
yeah though I guess Dockerhub has caches and uses a CDN
03:49
<MikeSmith>
the slowest part of running it is actually a part that calls "gpg --recv-keys" to get my gpg key and check the gpg sig for the downloaded jar
03:50
<MikeSmith>
which is probably overkill because I also have it checking the SHA1 sum for ot
03:50
<Domenic>
railgun: that looks like a good start. Missing an OffscreenCanvas <dt> (you can have multiple <dt>s for a given <dd>), and need to use <code> inside the <dt>s
04:10
<railgun>
Domenic: just rebased against master and added the <dt> for OffscreenCanvas
04:10
<Domenic>
railgun: great! Feel free to submit a PR so we can review
04:12
<railgun>
sure I'll submit it as soon as I add <code> inside the <dt>s
04:16
<railgun>
no <code> for otherwise right?
04:22
<Domenic>
Right
04:36
<railgun>
just made the PR https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/3463 Domenic: can you verify me?
04:36
<Domenic>
railgun: I'll do so tomorrow at work :)
04:39
<railgun>
thanks!
06:41
<annevk>
railgun: the <dl> needs to be inside the <ol> unfortunately as a step; returning good needs to be the last step applicable to all types
06:42
<annevk>
railgun: my instructions were faulty :/
15:54
<railgun>
annevk: is there an example somewhere in the source that I can reference? I'm still not sure where to put the ol and li tags
17:50
<annevk>
railgun: I hope Domenic can help out; I’m back in a week
17:51
<Domenic>
railgun: basically the algorithm should not just be a <dl>
17:51
<Domenic>
It should be an <ol> with two items
17:51
<Domenic>
1. Switch on image
17:51
<Domenic>
2. Return good
17:51
<Domenic>
And in more detail on 1
17:51
<Domenic>
<li><p>Switch on image:</p> <dl>...</dl></li>
17:51
<Domenic>
(well, I forgot the <var> I guess)
18:38
<railgun>
Domenic: is this correct? https://i.imgur.com/gaBvJcf.jpg
18:40
<railgun>
output is https://i.imgur.com/NJkkWnD.jpg
19:07
<Domenic>
railgun: looks perfect!
19:55
<railgun>
Domenic: one last thing, should I add "run these steps" back to the first sentence?
19:56
<Domenic>
railgun: hmm good question. We're pretty inconsistent so far. I guess maybe add it back to minimize changes. Maybe one day we'll figure out whether we want to be consistent there.
20:10
<railgun>
Domenic: done and updated
20:22
<railgun>
https://i.imgur.com/PaPDRw3.png hope this is fine (I can amend my commit if it's really needed)
21:07
<Domenic>
Ah, I missed that. Would have been better to not do that, but no big deal. (And not worth fixing now.)
21:09
<Domenic>
Congrats on your first contribution! As I said on the PR, it's a really nice one :)
21:15
<railgun>
thanks for the help
22:14
<railgun>
learned a lot from doing that issue, hope you don't mind if I take on some more issues later
23:38
<Domenic>
For sure, I'm looking forward to it!