| 00:04 | <annevk> | ah, thanks |
| 02:16 | <kochi> | railgun: thanks, i'll follow those bugs in the bugzilla. |
| 02:32 | <devsnek> | is the loader spec just waiting on realms to finalise now? |
| 02:33 | <annevk> | devsnek: I don’t think loader will happen as-is; need something that builds on service workers instead |
| 02:33 | <devsnek> | yea thats what the warning says |
| 02:34 | <devsnek> | all the workers are fully spec'd now, realms are still stage 1 so i assumed thats why the spec isn't advancing |
| 02:35 | <annevk> | Don’t think realms matter here, but dunno |
| 02:35 | <devsnek> | i don't know much about any of this hehe, thats why i came by to ask :) |
| 03:34 | <yhirano__> | annevk: they look unnecessary to me. if you agree i'd like to remove the copying steps. |
| 03:47 | <Krinkle> | TIL, xhr terminates an ongoing xhr when opening the next ; https://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/#the-open()-method |
| 03:47 | <Krinkle> | interesting |
| 03:47 | <Krinkle> | i guess due to some of the fields being static? |
| 03:50 | <Krinkle> | or.. this is only about the same instance being reused, right. I don't even... |
| 04:28 | <Domenic> | Don't use XHR :) |
| 05:20 | <domfarolino> | ^ |