| 07:08 | <Domenic> | annevk: If you click "Details" in the PR's participation check you'll get to https://participate.whatwg.org/agreement-status?user=yoavweiss&repo=fetch which is a real-time view with a form at the bottom for updating GitHub. It indicates Yoav is still not quite set up; my guess is his org membership is not public. |
| 07:09 | <Domenic> | See also https://github.com/whatwg/participate.whatwg.org/issues/21 for reducing one step |
| 07:09 | <yoav> | checking on my end |
| 07:10 | <yoav> | yup, was private |
| 07:10 | <yoav> | should be good now |
| 07:11 | <Domenic> | Perfect. I'll do the tell-GitHub-about it step, although anyone can do it by going to that URL and pasting https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/659 in the box |
| 07:11 | <annevk> | Domenic: thanks |
| 07:12 | <annevk> | All green now |
| 07:17 | <annevk> | yoav: all I meant with follow-up issue was filing one, no need to have it solved straight away |
| 07:59 | <yoav> | annevk: oh, OK :) I'll file one |
| 08:00 | smaug____ | doesn't yet have an opinion on imperative API. Gut feeling is that non-direct-child-nodes shouldn't be supported, but not sure. |
| 08:06 | <annevk> | I guess we made some progress on it in the sense that we have an updated version of the problem space |
| 08:18 | <yoav> | annevk: so, basically you want me to file a Fetch equivalent of https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-csp/issues/282? |
| 08:23 | <annevk> | yoav: yeah I suppose |
| 08:24 | <annevk> | yoav: I wasn't aware we already track it there, but tracking it on both sides seems good |
| 08:24 | <yoav> | cool, will do |
| 08:29 | <yoav> | annevk: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/683 |
| 09:29 | <annevk> | yoav: I think the only thing remaining is impl bugs |
| 09:29 | <annevk> | yoav: they weren't filed as part of the CSP change it seems |
| 09:29 | <annevk> | mkwst: maybe make that a policy? To file impl bugs for WebAppSec normative spec changes? |
| 11:27 | <annevk> | smaug____: I'd appreciate review of https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/585 |
| 11:30 | <smaug____> | annevk: let me have lunch first |
| 11:37 | <annevk> | Hmm, Chrome exposes Touch / TouchEvent on desktop, but nobody else does? |
| 11:37 | <annevk> | foolip: known interop issue? ^^ |
| 11:37 | <annevk> | Not sure how to test relatedTargets then... |
| 13:21 | <smaug____> | annevk: so is the diff in the first comment of https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/585 the right one to look at? |
| 13:22 | <smaug____> | (it isn't clear to me from the UI what the 'diff' refers to) |
| 13:35 | <annevk> | smaug____: yes |
| 13:36 | <annevk> | smaug____: it’s a human readable diff of the whole PR |
| 15:47 | <Ms2ger> | Anyone around who can explain why a ServiceWorkerRegistration needs {installing,waiting,active} attributes? Why is one not enough? |
| 15:48 | <annevk> | Ms2ger: when you install a new one, you might also have a different active one serving content at the moment |
| 16:16 | <foolip> | annevk: that sounds familiar, dtapuska would know the background |