09:47
<annevk>
yoav: I'm not sure how I'm supposed to review https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/13518
09:48
<annevk>
yoav: the "current model" is not sound and I'm also not an expert in it
09:50
<yoav>
OK
09:52
<yoav>
annevk: I think there's value in adding those tests, to make sure current implementations are abiding to this model, even if we'd prefer to move to a more restrictive one in the future
09:52
<yoav>
but if you feel uncomfortable reviewing, I can try to find someone else
09:54
<annevk>
yoav: I do, thanks
12:35
<ondras>
w 24
12:35
<ondras>
damn sorry
13:58
<Bitgod>
Good morning friends :)
14:00
<annevk>
Ms2ger: where does https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#legacy-platform-object-defineownproperty invoke a getter?
14:02
<Ms2ger>
annevk, I don't think it does, why do you ask?
14:04
<annevk>
Ms2ger: I'm trying to figure out https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/713
14:06
<Ms2ger>
annevk, I was suggesting [[Set]] and [[DefineOwnProperty]] didn't really need to be consistent, because they're doing different things
14:07
<annevk>
Ms2ger: I think I see now
14:08
<annevk>
Ms2ger: I guess I don't quite see why we have the "supports" abstraction
14:08
<annevk>
Ms2ger: why not see "if it has a getter" and "if it has a setter" throughout
14:08
<Ms2ger>
annevk, that would be fine by me
14:09
<annevk>
Ms2ger: it seems that heycam's strategy was that there's "supports" which you always use and then there's specializations
14:09
<annevk>
Ms2ger: I'm fine with going the other way, but it'd be good to be consistent about it or at least file an issue about such a plan?
14:09
<Ms2ger>
annevk, I'll file the issue
14:09
<annevk>
ta
16:09
<dtapuska>
annevk: I'd like to get https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/853 merged but not sure how to proceed cause I don't know what we should do there. Firefox has landed code already matching the PR and the tests
16:10
<annevk>
dtapuska: I don’t understand how the note is true necessarily
16:11
<annevk>
dtapuska: I also don’t have time right now unfortunately
16:11
<annevk>
dtapuska: maybe JakeA can help me tomorrow?
16:13
<dtapuska>
annevk: let me explain why I wrote the note.. previously when stale while revalidate was implemented it was implemented at the network service so there wasn't any attribution of the revalidation request with the page doing the fetching. So if it started a revalidation of say a gigantic resource it wouldn't get terminated because the network service was doing the fetching it wasn't associated with the browsing context being
16:13
<dtapuska>
terminated.
18:24
<Domenic>
annevk: did you want to give https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/4465 another look?
20:32
<annevk>
dtapuska: the problem is that not all fetches have a context iirc
20:32
<annevk>
Domenic: I was hoping for someone else, maybe JakeA?
22:31
<Domenic>
JakeA would be ideal, I hope he can make time :)