| 01:01 | <MikeSmith> | just now heard that Google is using HTTP Signed Exchanges for Google Search, as of today |
| 08:34 | <annevk> | JakeA: while you're looking at whatwg/html, Domenic and I were hoping you could look at https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/4465 |
| 14:02 | <JakeA> | Ah, sorry for missing the messages. I wish IRC cloud used push messages so I got notifications even if the tab is GC'd |
| 14:03 | <JakeA> | I'll go through those issues in a bit (but today) |
| 14:04 | <smaug____> | MikeSmith: does W3C not have anymore simple form to request new password? |
| 17:49 | <bkardell> | Are there typos in this text? I find that hard to very very hard to decipher, but maybe it's just me? Does the first sentence intend to say, for example "In [a] shadow-including tree[,] order is..." https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/LcqzdGHk/ |
| 17:56 | <annevk> | bkardell: it’s “correct” in that I’m pretty sure we meant to write it that way |
| 17:57 | <bkardell> | "In shadow-including tree order, is" |
| 17:57 | <bkardell> | what is? |
| 18:22 | <annevk> | bkardell: maybe the comma before is should be dropped |
| 18:34 | <TabAtkins> | The comma isn't *wrong* there; it can be used to separate out an opening phrase from the following sentence, if both are complex. |
| 19:18 | <bkardell> | wait, sorry... I don't mean to waste people's time if this is a silly topic, but TabAtkins are you saying that you read the first sentence in a way you can understand that seems correct? "In shadow-including tree order, is shadow-including preorder, depth-first traversal of a node tree." |
| 19:18 | <Mek> | I have no idea how I'm supposed to parse that sentence either |
| 19:19 | <TabAtkins> | Yes. Perhaps better written as: |
| 19:19 | <TabAtkins> | "In shadow-including tree order" is shadow-including preorder... |
| 19:19 | <TabAtkins> | Stuff before comma is an entire phrase being defined by the rest of the sentence. |
| 19:20 | <TabAtkins> | There's an article missing in the sentence tho, I think. |
| 19:20 | <TabAtkins> | "is a shadow-including preorder" |
| 19:21 | <Mek> | Perhaps even better than would be "A traversal "in shadow-including tree order" is [...]"? |
| 19:21 | <TabAtkins> | Sure. |
| 19:26 | <bkardell> | ok yeah, that is what I was saying. I would try sending a pull or something but I'm honestly not sure how to parse it to offer better verbiage so ... open an issue maybe? |
| 22:27 | <SamB> | So I was thinking of coming on to ask what part of the HTML spec defines text/plain handling ... and then I found https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#read-text |
| 22:28 | <SamB> | it's a funny world where (a) I want such a thing (b) such a thing exists |
| 22:40 | <SamB> | Hmm, I'm going around in circles trying to understand it though :-( |