| 11:25 | <ondras> | so, when using Custom Elements, what is the proper way to reflect properties:attributes? |
| 11:25 | <ondras> | make setters/getters delegate their work to set/getAttribute? |
| 11:25 | <ondras> | or the other way around? |
| 11:25 | <ondras> | (just got into an infinite loop handling this...) |
| 15:31 | <Domenic> | ondras: the former. That is how native elements work, per the specification of Reflect. |
| 15:40 | <cscott> | i've got a question stemming from https://github.com/whatwg/sg/issues/84 |
| 15:40 | <cscott> | where the steering group has apparently be stymied for over six months about whether or not the Wikimedia Foundation is "in the field of web technologies" |
| 15:41 | <cscott> | anyway, in the past few weeks the WMF actually joined the W3C and is a member now |
| 15:42 | <cscott> | does that simplify the question at all? Is the W3C an "entity" in the WHATWG? |
| 15:44 | <hober> | cscott: the w3c isn't a legal entity at all |
| 15:45 | <hober> | cscott: there are four w3c "host institutions" that are legal entities, and (iirc) none of them have signed the whatwg participant agreement |
| 15:51 | <cscott> | so short story, the w3c doesn't have any defined role wrt the whatwg, and so joining the w3c is a bit of a nothingburger in terms of resolving issue #84 |
| 15:52 | <cscott> | is that right? |
| 15:54 | <Ms2ger> | I'm afraid so |
| 16:00 | <annevk> | cscott: if your organization is fine with joining the W3C, legal shouldn't have a problem signing the WHATWG agreement I think |
| 16:05 | hober | (aside) cscott: out of curiosity, who's WMF's w3c advisory committee representative? |
| 16:06 | hober | brionv? is he still there? i'm very out of the loop |