05:23
<JonathanNeal>
When the MDN docs call it the executor, do they mean resolver? https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise
05:24
<JonathanNeal>
I otherwise see it referred to as `[[Resolve]](promise, x)`
07:49
<annevk>
jgraham: http://testthewebforward.org/docs/running_tests.html wptrunner is a broken link
07:52
<annevk>
jgraham: I've been looking for a while now including https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/blob/master/serve.py and I cannot find how to configure localhost
07:54
<annevk>
found it
08:02
<annevk>
no permission
08:02
<annevk>
oh well, found a workaround
08:13
<annevk>
Turns out IE does very weird things in this area
09:47
<annevk>
Domenic: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2014OctDec/0091.html
10:09
<Domenic>
annevk: nice
11:54
<MikeSmith>
Ms2ger: I've done nothing on that encodings PR so far, so feel free :-)
11:55
MikeSmith
spent the day outside on a date
11:57
<MikeSmith>
Ms2ger: I want to look at it eventually regardless, just as another way to get more familiar with the spec, and I don't mind if somebody else formally reviews it and merges first
11:57
<MikeSmith>
but I will try to make time for it tomorrow anyway
11:58
<Ms2ger>
I do'n
11:58
<Ms2ger>
*I don't necessarily want to get more familiar with the spec
11:58
<Ms2ger>
So go ahead :)
11:59
<MikeSmith>
heh
11:59
<MikeSmith>
ok
12:52
<annevk>
The algorithm for iso-2022-jp is mostly new, so I don't think anybody other than me will be overly familiar
12:52
<MikeSmith>
yeah
12:52
<annevk>
Perhaps unsung hero Arkadiusz Michalski
12:53
<MikeSmith>
annevk: question,
12:53
<MikeSmith>
ah yeah
12:53
<MikeSmith>
that guy
12:53
<MikeSmith>
annevk: question about http://w3c-test.org/conformance-checkers/html/elements/a/href/userinfo-password-contains-pile-of-poo-novalid.html
12:53
<MikeSmith>
galimatias reports an error for taht
12:54
<annevk>
MikeSmith: seems like it should be valid
12:54
<MikeSmith>
"Illegal character in user or password: not a URL code point."
12:54
<MikeSmith>
ok yah that's what I thought
12:54
<MikeSmith>
will file a bug on galimatias
12:55
<annevk>
I don't how that's not a URL code point
12:55
<MikeSmith>
you didn't change that at some earlier point?
12:56
<MikeSmith>
for userinfo specifically, I mean?
12:56
<annevk>
I don't remember doing such a thing
12:56
<MikeSmith>
oh even in that case it would have been a different error than "not a URL code point"
13:12
<MikeSmith>
annevk: weird, as far as I can see, the relevant part of the galimatias sources actually already conforms to the spec
13:12
<MikeSmith>
annevk: https://github.com/smola/galimatias/blob/master/src/main/java/io/mola/galimatias/URLUtils.java#L237
13:12
<MikeSmith>
specifically https://github.com/smola/galimatias/blob/master/src/main/java/io/mola/galimatias/URLUtils.java#L262
13:13
<annevk>
MikeSmith: I guess you'd have to check the parser bit then
13:14
<MikeSmith>
yeah I have. But I guess I need to check more
13:15
<annevk>
https://github.com/smola/galimatias/blob/master/src/main/java/io/mola/galimatias/URLParser.java#L511 looks alright...
13:25
<MikeSmith>
annevk: yup
13:25
<MikeSmith>
this is odd. I'm building it in my workspace and it's now failing its own test suite due to this same problem
13:26
<MikeSmith>
I'm wondering if it might be caused by some difference between Java 6 and 7
13:31
<onur>
Hi. I am wondering who is copyright owner of whatwg.org/html and what is the licence of this page?
13:41
<MikeSmith>
onur: there's a statement at the very end of the spec if you scroll down
13:42
<MikeSmith>
onur: and at https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/acknowledgements.html#acknowledgments if you don't want to load the whole thing as a single document
13:51
<onur>
acknowledgements are not enough for me. I need to declare clear licence text and copyright holder of this page. Google's gumbo-parser have this page in its source, I prepared a Debian package for gumbo-parser but unfortunately we can't add gumbo-parser into Debian because this page has no copyright information, licence and owner...
13:52
<MikeSmith>
that statement is not part of the acknowledgements
13:52
<MikeSmith>
it's a copyright statement
13:52
<MikeSmith>
and a license statement
13:52
<MikeSmith>
"You are granted a license to use, reproduce and create derivative works of this document."
13:53
<MikeSmith>
and a little bit above that, "This specification is written by Ian Hickson (Google, ian⊙hc), with contributions from Simon Pieters (Opera, simonp⊙oc) in the img section"
13:54
<Ms2ger>
onur, IceWeasel has parts of the same text, fwiw
17:04
<annevk>
I wonder when someone will come up with a solution to decentralized software packages
17:04
<annevk>
Oh wait, that's the web
17:09
<MikeSmith>
heh
17:23
<annevk>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19961#c3 could use review (security considerations for encodings)
18:38
<MikeSmith>
annevk: r? https://critic.hoppipolla.co.uk/r/3129 https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/1371
18:38
<MikeSmith>
annevk: see also https://github.com/smola/galimatias/pull/46
18:38
MikeSmith
heads off to bed
19:07
<annevk>
MikeSmith: seems like there's a small bug there
19:15
<annevk>
MikeSmith: nn