07:28
Hixie
replies to an e-mail from 2004
07:32
<phroggy>
Hixie: what are the legacy reasons why we can't allow arbitrary markup in <option>? And did you mean to say we can't allow additional elements to be nested inside an <option> element, or also that we can't allow the <option> element to have a new property, which was the suggestion?
07:33
<Hixie>
<option> parse rules are pretty much set in stone now. And the former.
07:34
<phroggy>
I kinda like the idea of <option value="foo" icon="foo.png">
07:34
<Hixie>
is it something OS UIs do?
07:34
<Hixie>
(show me)
07:35
<phroggy>
not generally.
07:35
<phroggy>
hmm..
07:35
<phroggy>
I'm pretty sure I've seen icons in menus on Gnome and KDE...
07:35
<phroggy>
not necessarily for option lists.
07:36
<phroggy>
these are the kinds of icons that immediately come to mind: http://www.linuxine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/gnome-delete.jpg
07:37
<Hixie>
<option> is the wrong element for that, you want <menu><command>, which has an icon="" attribute.
07:37
<phroggy>
ah, sweet.
07:38
<phroggy>
but while this example is obviously from a menu, I can definitely imagine situations where icons on options would be nice.
07:39
<phroggy>
I'm a big fan of little icons like those, helping the user to more quickly recognize what they're looking at.
07:39
<Hixie>
if it was common UI, then sure
07:40
<phroggy>
maybe something for HTML 6, when OS UIs have caught up to my imagination...
07:41
<Hixie>
:-)
07:42
phroggy
wonders how long it will take Microsoft to post the transcript of last week's IE chat
07:43
<phroggy>
I think they ignored my questions about <input type="search"> and placeholder.
07:43
<phroggy>
but it's possible I just missed their response.
07:45
Hixie
replies to yet more 2004 e-mail
07:45
<gsnedders>
hiho
07:45
<Hixie>
morning
07:46
gsnedders
is five rows behind you
07:46
<gsnedders>
smedero is beside me
07:46
smedero
needs coffee
07:46
<gsnedders>
drugs--
07:47
<Lachy>
aren't the coffee machines set up outside yet?
07:47
<smedero>
lachy: when I walked by they weren't up quite yet
07:51
<gsnedders>
Is HTML broken?
07:51
<Hixie>
yes?
07:51
<Hixie>
if it wasn't broken we wouldn't be fixing it!
07:51
<gsnedders>
:)
07:53
phroggy
breaks off another little piece of it
07:57
<annevk4>
wow, network fails
08:15
<Hixie>
where did anne go
08:15
<Hixie>
someone near anne poke him online again
08:16
<Hixie>
apparentl "near anne" is me. ok then.
10:05
<Hixie>
this network is horrible
10:06
<Hixie>
this hotel holds this conference every two years, you'd think they'd have worked out capacity by now
10:06
<gsnedders>
Hixie: Why do we come back?
10:07
<Hixie>
dunno
10:08
<Lachy>
I'm not having any problems with the network today. I only find it inconvenient because of the login process
10:08
<Hixie>
we're geting ~25% packet loss and >1000ms pings
10:09
<Lachy>
pinging to what host?
10:09
<Hixie>
`any
10:09
<Hixie>
the second hop is the problem
10:11
<Lachy>
pinging google.com a few times, I get packet loss raning from 0% to 100%
10:11
<Hixie>
right, we're averaging about 25%
10:13
<Hixie>
and about 800ms average ping, stddev 500ms
10:14
<gsnedders>
502.225ms average, stddev 188.816ms here
10:14
<gsnedders>
only 10% loss
10:15
<Hixie>
which is about as bad as you can get before it doesn't count as a network anymore
10:16
<Hixie>
how many pings are you testing over?
10:16
<Hixie>
make sure to test over a long sample
10:16
<gsnedders>
10
10:16
<Hixie>
with such a high variance, you have to wait a while
10:16
<Hixie>
[24~--- 80.10.46.241 ping statistics ---
10:16
<Hixie>
[24~--- 80.10.46.241 ping statistics ---93 packets transmitted, 65 packets received, 30% packet loss
10:16
<Hixie>
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 201.165/770.687/2145.384/449.159 ms
10:17
<karlUshi>
the hotel is not in charge of the network. Orange is. The worse thing is that it is exactly the same engineers from two years ago. And the issues have been clearly introduced with the bad previous experiences
10:18
<Hixie>
wow, you'd think orange would be able to do better
10:19
<gsnedders>
100 packets transmitted, 97 packets received, 3% packet loss
10:19
<gsnedders>
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 221.420/558.546/1532.691/243.504 ms
10:19
<othermaciej>
Mr Last Week seems to really dig the name I assigned him
10:20
<othermaciej>
but I don't seem to have made his blog since he adopted said sobriquet as his own
10:20
<othermaciej>
"scathing comment about w3c management"
10:21
<othermaciej>
"disdainful scorn towards standards prescriptivists"
10:21
<Lachy>
doing a traceroute, there seems to be abour 4 problematic hops spread between here and google.colm
10:21
<Lachy>
*google.com
10:22
<Hixie>
once you hit one problematic hop, you can't tell if the others are problematic
10:22
<othermaciej>
"self-important statement of trivial truth"
10:22
<Lachy>
oh, right
10:22
<Hixie>
apparently i shouldn't complain about the network
10:22
<Hixie>
i just got disconnected altogether :-)
10:23
<Lachy>
Hixie, did you decide to skip this session, or are you sitting elsewhere in here?
10:24
<Hixie>
i'm in the hall
10:24
<Hixie>
i was going to work
10:24
<Hixie>
but that plan backfired
10:24
<Hixie>
since the network is unusable
10:24
<gsnedders>
I just lost power
10:24
<Lachy>
heh
10:24
<Hixie>
s/hall/corridor/
10:26
<nessy>
I was really looking forward to the plenary, but have been rather disappointed so far :(
10:26
<Hixie>
oh?
10:26
<Lachy>
I was looking forward to it only because it's the first one I've been to
10:31
<Hixie>
ok i can't work on this network. bbl.
11:56
<Philip`>
If people are going to insist on putting annoying video adverts on the web, I wish they at least knew how to do it without horrible interlacing effects
13:53
<Hixie>
annevk4: so is the the case where both a parent and a child element of that parent element have the tabindex attribute set unclear?
13:55
<Lachy>
Hixie, here's the documentations for opera's implementation of showNotification() in widgets that we were talking about last night. http://dev.opera.com/libraries/widgetobject/docs/widget.dml#showNotification
13:55
<Lachy>
it seems quite different from the one in HTML5
13:55
<Hixie>
k
13:56
<annevk4>
Hixie, I probably should have checked :/
13:56
<Hixie>
heh
13:56
<Hixie>
let me know if it's unclear :-)
14:08
<arve__>
http://www.vpmujuruoffice.gov.zw/ has <topmargin="1" leftmargin="0"> in a noframes section
14:09
<arve__>
( <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0"> )
14:11
<annevk4>
http://source.android.com/
15:09
<hsivonen>
looks like the network here breaks AFP
15:17
<Lachy>
Has anyone seen Marcos around anywhere?
15:20
<hsivonen>
I can't upload my slides due to TCP connections not finishing properly :-(
15:21
<Philip`>
Tunnel through SSH, so the connection never needs to finish
16:08
<hsivonen>
Philip`: tunneling scp over ssh isn't making my scp connection end
16:27
<Lachy>
apparently the economic crisis will both favour open source http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/10/21/0116221&from=rss as well as elimiate it http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/10/22/1354207&from=rss
16:28
<Dashiva>
It's tempting to make a joke about eliminating it = doing it a favor :)
16:56
<hsivonen>
Is Orange limiting uploads?
16:57
hsivonen
gives up on trying to get the slides to a server
16:58
<annevk4>
we uploaded videos
16:59
<Hixie>
gsnedders: yt? games?
17:00
<gsnedders>
Hixie: I'm here
17:00
<gsnedders>
Hixie: I'll come at the end of this, the final lightening talk
17:01
<gsnedders>
Hixie: You just outside the door?
17:01
<Hixie>
yeah
17:22
<MikeSmith>
W3C tech plenary now wrapped up for the day
17:22
<MikeSmith>
more fun on the way tomorrow
18:14
zcorpan
got responses from the xhtml2 wg
18:14
zcorpan
has now replied
18:15
<zcorpan>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2008Oct/thread.html