00:04
<sicking_>
Hixie, workers spec doesn't seem to say that Workers should be EventTargets, only that the scope i
00:04
<sicking_>
s
00:58
<Hixie>
sicking: can you send mail on that? i'm in an airport right now, not in the best position to remember feedback
00:58
<Hixie>
thanks
10:14
<zcorpan>
"8592-01-01T02:09+02:09" Midnight UTC on ...
10:15
<zcorpan>
Hixie: doesn't look like midnight to me
10:16
<zcorpan>
oh wait
10:16
<zcorpan>
nm
10:16
<hsivonen>
it seems that UTC is to UT1 what URL is to IRI
10:32
<hsivonen>
zcorpan: I filed bugs for the input[size] and content-language mentioned in the sitepoint thread you mentioned yesterday. thanks
10:35
<hsivonen>
Hixie: if an author serves FooML+XBL2 to a browser, which tree would one put ARIA attributes in?
10:36
<hsivonen>
Hixie: I think axioms say the FooML tree
10:36
<hsivonen>
Hixie: but in practice a desire for encapsulation says the shadow tree created by XBL2
10:37
<hsivonen>
seems like a big accessibility problem down the road
11:30
<Dashiva>
Has the <q> thread managed to come up with a solution that allows using <q> in languages that puts the following punctuation within the quote marks?
11:31
<Dashiva>
I must admit to skimming the most outrageous quote trains :)
11:35
<hsivonen>
I wonder if I'd only contribute to the damage done by the denial of productivity effect of <q> if I pointed out some of its history in order to make a point that the semantic need is questionable...
11:47
<Lachy>
hsivonen, please do
11:50
<Lachy>
Dashiva, although I really hate that convention, the solution is to put the punctuation within the <q> element if that's what you need.
11:50
<Lachy>
IMHO, punctuation should only be within the quote marks if it is part of the quote itself, otherwise it should go after.
11:55
<didymos>
Lachy, but there are plenty of people who disagree with you :)
11:55
<didymos>
(myself not included, though)
11:55
<Dashiva>
Lachy: But that's just plain _wrong_ when the punctuation isn't part of the quote
12:00
<Philip`>
The correct method of quoting is obvious in the computerised world: you copy-and-paste what someone else wrote, put quotation marks around it, and then put all your extra words and punctuation outside the quotes
12:01
<Philip`>
The old world didn't have copy-and-paste, so they could be excused for doing silly things like adding punctuation inside quotes instead :-)
12:02
<hsivonen>
Lachy: I disagree with you in the case of en-US. :-)
12:03
<hsivonen>
one of the many problems with <q> is that languages high up in the pecking order (en-US and fr-FR) are illogical in the sense that quotation marks do not strictly delimit the quoted string
12:04
<Dashiva>
Eggsac-tly
12:05
<Lachy>
Dashiva, what exactly is wrong with what I said?
12:06
<hsivonen>
Lachy: what's wrong is that implementing what you said for en-US is economically a bad idea
12:06
<hsivonen>
Lachy: which inline box model bugs would you forgo the fixes for while top hackers implement punctuation flipping?
12:06
<Lachy>
hsivonen, I think you misunderstood what I said
12:07
<Dashiva>
Lachy: HTML does not have a mandate to change national languages
12:08
<Lachy>
if the punctuation should be within the quote marks, then the author should put it within the <q> element. e.g. <q>Some quote.</q> --> "Some quote." Otherwise, the author should put it outside. e.g. <q>Some quote</q>. --> "Some quote".
12:08
<Lachy>
Dashiva, I never said it did
12:09
Philip`
notes that IE8b2 (at least on an en-GB system) seems to use single quotes for <q> by default, and double quotes once you add lang=en
12:09
<hsivonen>
whoa. gsnedders isn't here today.
12:09
<hsivonen>
he has a copy of The Handbook, right?
12:10
<Dashiva>
Lachy: No, it seems you're suggesting mangling the quote instead
12:10
<Lachy>
what?
12:11
<Dashiva>
The trailing punctuation is not necessarily part of the quote
12:11
<Lachy>
It's not me mangling the quotes, it's the illogical languages that incorrectly stick punctuation within quotation marks where it doesn't belong.
12:12
<Lachy>
that's why I said "IMHO, punctuation should only be within the quote marks if it is part of the quote itself, otherwise it should go after."
12:12
<Dashiva>
Yes, but as I said, we don't go around changing languages
12:13
Philip`
sees that IE8b2 does 'x"y"z' for default <q> (on an en-GB system), "x'y'z" if lang=en or lang=en-xx where xx is not gb, and those double/single chevron things if lang=fr
12:14
<Lachy>
Philip`, so does it do "x'y'z" for en-AU?
12:14
<Philip`>
(When I say """ and "'", I mean the curly equivalents)
12:15
<Lachy>
(I'm not sure what the correct way is supposed to be, but I always do it that way)
12:15
<Philip`>
Lachy: Yes
12:16
<Lachy>
so is it doing that based on the system's own language settings when it isn't explicitly declared in the page?
12:16
<Philip`>
lang=no has funny quotes
12:16
<Philip`>
(Double-chevron, then comma/apostrophe or something)
12:17
<Philip`>
Lachy: I don't know - I'd need to change my system's language settings to test that, but I'm not sure how (and don't have time now)
12:17
Lachy
wonders what a Double-chevron is
12:18
<hsivonen>
Philip`: do you mean right-pointing double guillemet?
12:18
Philip`
might be using the wrong term
12:18
<Philip`>
I mean something that looks like 《
12:19
<Philip`>
which my font doesn't really like, so it's the character that's like <<